The final straw for some was when the CHP nominated Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, an openly religious right-winger, as its presidential candidate in 2014: the nationalist ulusalcı wing walked out.
It was a turbulent process because many claimed the party was ditching Ataturk’s legacy and veering to the right in an attempt to claim ground from AK. After modest gains in the 2011 election, Mr Kılıçdaroğlu turned inward and took to ridding the CHP of its cronies. More moderationīut it wasn’t just the party image that needed detoxifying it was the party itself. He assumed the reins of a party with a serious image problem: the CHP regularly came top in surveys when voters were asked which party they would never vote for. Kılıçdaroğlu turned inward to rid the party of its croniesĬhange came in 2010, when long-time party leader Deniz Baykal stepped down in a sex scandal and was replaced by Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, who had run an impressive albeit unsuccessful campaign for the Istanbul mayoralty the previous year. The CHP did increase its share of the vote in subsequent elections, but this was because the AK Party era had forced Turkish politics to consolidate and there were fewer parties afloat on the Turkish left wing. It was a policy with zero electoral benefit. Against the efficient and popular AK machine the CHP was the party of “old Turkey”: petty antagonism, wails of creeping Islamism and – astonishingly – calls for the military to stage another coup were all part of its tired mantra. Even after 2002, when the CHP emerged as the sole opposition to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s AK Party, it was difficult to describe it as a party of the left. The identity crisis lasted well into this century. It became a party of the left only in the 1960s and embraced social democracy in the 1970s, but the labels carried little resonance in Turkey, a country dominated by Cold War influences rather than a political spectrum in the European sense. Simply put, the CHP reacted badly to its own era of multiparty politics because it did not know what it stood for. The centre-right Democrats won a landslide, booting the party that built modern Turkey out of office. Craftily, it called a swift election before opposition parties could take form. With fascism becoming distinctly less fashionable after the Second World War, the CHP introduced a multiparty democracy in 1946.
#TOUCHCOPY 11.03 ACTIVATION CODE SOFTWARE#
Translated from Russian by MetaQuotes Software Corp.The CHP reacted badly to its own era of multiparty politics
In OnTradeTransaction, we determined whether Take Profit or Stop Loss triggered: if(deal_symbol=m_symbol.Name() & deal_magic=m_magic) In other words, it is a very simple and reliable way to determine that a trade resulted from Take Profit or Stop Loss.Īt the moment (build 1626), this Expert Advisor can only be checked in a live test - by launching it on a chart or in a debug mode on real data (F5 in the MetaEditor editor). The operation was executed as a result of Take Profit activation
The operation was executed as a result of Stop Loss activation The excellent enumeration ENUM_DEAL_REASON was added in build 1625: ENUM_DEAL_REASON OnTradeTransaction is used to determine whether a trade was performed after the activation of Stop loss or Take profit. If a trade is closed by Stop loss, the volume is doubled if it's closed by Take profit the minimum volume is used.